Buggy Lab Reflection Blog Prompt:
1. Reflect on your design section. What did you do well? What do you need to improve next time?
2. Reflect on your data collection and processing section. What did you do well? What do you need to improve next time?
However, our data collection procedure was good in that the times were similar within each trial. Due to this high precision, we had low uncertainty in the times (on the x-axis.) The uncertainty in the y-axis was calculated well because I first calculated the simple uncertainty, then accounted for the buggy's curved path of travel.
3. Reflect on your conclusion. What did you do well? What do you need to improve next time?
4. Do you think revising after the feedback session in class improved your lab report?
Yes, the feedback session helped catch little mistakes that I did not originally catch. However, I do not believe that anyone in our class has a good enough grasp on how the reports should be formatted yet to make any big corrections.
Yes, the feedback session helped catch little mistakes that I did not originally catch. However, I do not believe that anyone in our class has a good enough grasp on how the reports should be formatted yet to make any big corrections.
5. Was the turnitin feedback helpful? If so, what should Mrs. Weidman keep doing. If not, what would be more helpful?
Yes, it was helpful! I like how the comments were right on top of the part of the lab in question- so there is no confusion in what you are concerned about.
No comments:
Post a Comment